Monday, May 14th, 2007--

About 1000 miles north of the Great Lakes, near Hudson Bay, Canada, the pull of gravity is a little weaker. A new study in the journal Science explains why.

Differences in gravity are not unusual on Earth: “If the Earth was a perfect sphere, the gravitational field would be the same everywhere,” says Mark Tamisiea, a geodetic geophysicist at the Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory in the United Kingdom and lead author on the study.

But our planet’s bumpy surface, the water flow on the planet, and the movement of plates below Earth's crust can all change the pull of gravity. “Gravity changes on many different time scales, from a matter of weeks to centuries,” says Tamisiea, adding that the variation in gravity can explain “quite a bit about what’s going on in the Earth.”

Differences in gravity can be mapped by tracking the movement of two orbiting satellites, Tamisiea says. As the Earth’s gravitational pull increases and decreases, the position of the satellites also changes.

For example, if two satellites were flying above a large mountain, Tamisiea explains, the first satellite would be pulled closer to the mountain. The mountain has more mass, so there is a stronger gravitational pull. As the first satellite is pulled toward the mountain, it moves farther away from the second satellite—the distance between the satellites increases. As the second satellite approaches the mountain it is pulled in and the distance between the satellites decreases again. The changes in distance between the satellites can be translated into a map of the Earth's gravitational field.

Using data like this, Tamisiea and his team mapped gravity, and how gravitational pull is changing over time, which allowed them to understand what is causing the Hudson Bay gravity anomaly.

The researchers created models that predicted 25 – 45 percent of the Hudson Bay gravitational signal was due to the last Ice Age—20,000 years ago, when a 2-mile-thick Laurentide ice sheet covered Canada, the land sank under the ice. “Although that ice sheet has long disappeared," Tamisiea says, the land "is still recovering." The depression means less mass, which means less pull.

The scientists also discovered that the changes in gravity were larger in two spots, suggesting the Laurentide ice sheet was made up of two domes of ice—not one.

The primary driver of the lower gravity? The data suggest that plate tectonics and mantle convention are responsible. Mantle convection can cause plates inside the Earth to move vertically—in this case, Tamisiea says that convection probably dragged the crust down, which decreased the mass under Hudson Bay, decreasing the gravitational pull.

What did you think of the story? Send us some feedback.

--Flora Lichtman

Sources

Mark Tamisiea
Geodetic Geophysicist The Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory United Kingdom

Tools:

Elsewhere on sciencefriday.com

• 

  Next Great Quake?
  Are scientists getting any better at earthquake prediction?

• 

  Watering Pole
  Mars has enough frozen water to cover the planet in 36 feet of water.

• 

  Sensing the Atmosphere of Distant Planets
  Scientists using the Hubble Space Telescope have been able to detect the chemical signature of methane in the atmosphere of a planet orbiting a star 63 light-years away.

• 

  What's a Planet, Anyway?
  In 2006, astronomers voted to remove Pluto from the list of planets in our solar system -- but the controversy over just what should be called a planet lives on.

• 

  Looking forward to LHC
  Physicists around the world are looking forward to the startup of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN later this year. We'll talk about the project, and a legal challenge to the collider that argues the work could be too risky.

• 

  Video: Your Video: Hotel Mauna Kea

Explore More

• Physics
• General Physics
• Planetary and Earth Sciences