News Brief Archives
Home > News Briefs > New Moon
This photograph of the full Moon was taken from Apollo 11 during its trip back to Earth from a distance of roughly 18,000 km. Courtesy of NASA
Friday, December 21st, 2007--
The moon might not be as old as scientists thought--it may be thirty million years younger, according to a new study in the journal Nature. Mathieu Touboul of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland and his colleagues analyzed the elements in moon specimens to determine the moon's age.
Using a technique called radiometric dating, the researchers estimated the age of the moon by measuring the presence of the isotope tungsten-182, in relation to hafnium-182. Hafnium-182 radioactively decays into tungsten-182 with a half-life of 9 million years.
But using tungsten to date the moon can be complicated by the fact that tungsten-182 is also produced by another element. In past studies, the other production of tungsten had to be corrected for. In this study, the researchers figured out a way to isolate tungsten produced only by hafnium--allowing for more accurate dating.
The new data challenges not only the assumption about the moon's age, but also how the moon was formed. Current computer models predict that the moon was made when a planet the size of Mars--called the "impactor"--smashed into proto-Earth, a junior-sized version (60-70 percent of the size) of our planet today, experts say. It was thought that during this collision, a piece of the impactor spun off and formed the moon.
The data from this study showed the tungsten composition of moon rock was identical to that on Earth--unlikely to be a mere coincidence, experts say. "We shouldn't expect the giant impactor that hit the earth--that formed the moon--to be essentially the same as Earth," says geochemist Alan Brandon of NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, who published a corresponding Nature paper describing the results. This suggests that the moon wasn't made of the impactor, as previous models suggested, but of proto-Earth. "Generally this has been the model that everybody has used," Brandon says, adding "so it is kind of Earth-shaking to find out now that it's different."
--Flora Lichtman
Alan Brandon
Astromaterials Research Office
NASA Johnson Space Center
Houston, TX
Tiny Time Capsule
A tiny ancient crystal is packing the geologic history of the Earth
Spacebugs
When Salmonella goes up in space, it changes--and not for the better.
Designing for the Stars
What will the next generation of space suits look like?
Liquid Mirror Lunar Telescope
Using liquid for the telescope's mirror could let scientists see deeper into the Universe than ever before.
Space Rocks Auction
Pssst... wanna buy a space rock?
Chinese Moon Mission Launch
This week, China launched Chang'e One, a robotic lunar orbiter. Does the launch mean the start of a new global space race?
A Return to Mercury After 33 Years
Scientists are reviewing data from a flyby of the planet Mercury earlier this week.
How Old is the Grand Canyon?
New research gives a date to the start of the formation of the Grand Canyon -- 17 million years ago.
Mars Update
We get an update on the latest results from orbiting observations of Mars.
Sensing the Atmosphere of Distant Planets
Scientists using the Hubble Space Telescope have been able to detect the chemical signature of methane in the atmosphere of a planet orbiting a star 63 light-years away.
What's a Planet, Anyway?
In 2006, astronomers voted to remove Pluto from the list of planets in our solar system -- but the controversy over just what should be called a planet lives on.
Print
Mail