| Science
Friday > Archives
> 2000
> February
> February 18, 2000:
Hour One:Global Climate Change
| Over 100 years ago, Swedish scientist
Svante Arrhenius proposed the possibility of human-caused climate
change. Since then, the world has become more and more dependent
on fossil fuels for energy. Today, approximately 85% of the world's
energy comes from fossil fuels. Meanwhile, the possibility of
global long-term climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions
has moved firmly into the public consciousness. |
 NOAA temperature anomaly data, 1880-1999. Clickfor larger view. |
 Cores from coral can be used to gather climate data...(OAR/NURP image) |
Carbon dioxide is one of the most likely
"greenhouse gases." Other gases, from methane to water vapor,
can also cause the greenhouse effect. When in the atmosphere,
these gases can act like a thermal blanket around the planet,
preventing heat energy from the sun from radiating back out into
space. Possible results of this warming, some scientists say,
could include changing rainfall patterns worldwide, shifting agricultural
zones, and melting glacier and ice caps.
In 1992, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change recognized the potential problem and set an ultimate
objective to stabilize greenhouse gas levels below dangerous
levels (though the document didn't say what "dangerous" levels
were.) The Kyoto Protocol, established at a 1997 meeting, set
targets for emission levels in developed countries. A collective
5% reduction in emissions from industrialized countries was
mandated.
The problem is very political. Tensions between developed countries
(which often achieved their industrialized glory years through
processes involving massive emissions of greenhouse gases) and
developing countries, which do not want any limits on their
potential expansion, are high. In the U.S., there are political
tensions over the costs and necessity of expensive emission
controls.
|  ...as can ice cores... (National Ice Core Lab/NSF/USGS image) |  ...and tree rings. (NWS image) |
Scientifically, the global climate change debate can also be problematic.While
there is very strong evidence pointing to the existence of global warming,
there is some uncertainty. But how much uncertainty is too much? And
how high a level of certainty should be required before action is necessary?
In this hour of Science Friday, broadcast live from the annual meeting
of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington,
D.C., we'll talk about the science, politics, and economics of the global
climate change debate. Call in with your comments and questions, and
be sure to tune in.
Guests: Devra Davis Senior Scientist World Resources Institute Washington, D.C. Rev. Hank Hilton Assistant Professor, Economics Loyola College Baltimore, Maryland Michael MacCracken Executive Director, National Assessment Coordination Office U.S. Global Change Research Program Washington, D.C. John Topping President Climate Institute Washington, D.C. Books/Articles Discussed: Related Links: - NASA's Global Change Master Directory
U.S. EPA's Global Warming
website
Woods
Hole Research Center's Global Warming Page
A Paleo
Perspective on Global Warming
AGU Web Site: Deciphering
Mysteries of Past Climate From Antarctic Ice Cores
Info from the
EDF
- The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
Climate Institute
US Global Climate Research Program
Skepticism - Global Warming
Global Warming - skeptical
group
Junkscience.com -- "All the
junk that's fit to debunk"
-
- This segment produced by:
Karin Vergoth Web producer: Charles Bergquist
|