S C I E N C E   F R I D A Y ®

SciFri Navbar

 

 

 

Questions about the show? mail them to scifri@npr.org

Questions/Comments about this site? Send them to producer@
sciencefriday.com

Web Producer:
Charles Bergquist

Executive Web Producer: Ira Flatow

© 1998, All Rights Reserved.

 

       

    Last week's topic: spam.
    We asked:
    should unsolicited bulk e-mail be allowed?
  • 125 listeners said no.
  • 26 said yes.

     Here are some excerpts from your mail...


    Mike Hedblom

    No! I receive about 10 SPAM a day at my work e-mail address. In addition to the 80+ valid messages that I have to process, the SPAM wastes my, and my company's time.

    Further, to forge a header is unetchical and goes against the honor system that has run the net for the last 25 years.

    These SPAMmers cry that it is there first amendment right to say what ever they want, and then they lie and say that they are someone else. May their hard disks seek forever.


    Bill Paterson

    Spammers contend the opposite of the statement above. Their arguments neglect the classic model of "the tragegy of the commons" whereby a public goood, the commons, is made unavailable to society at large. The use of a 150 db bullhorn to spread either political or commercial messages in a shopping center would entirely suppress all speech by individuals in that shopping center -- political, commercial, and personal. Spam is the 150 db bullhorn in my e-mail box. It fills my allotted diskspace and consumes my time, thus interfering with my own political, commercial and political speech.


    Janie Pederson

    It makes me use my energy to hit the delete key. I have enough to do as it is. I treat my junk my the same way, I put it in the recycle bin and have it hauled off. I have more sympathy with snail junk mail, because its funds the post office and keeps the price of my stamp down.


    Larry Tagrin

    Unsolicited email should not be allowed because it places the burden of managing the unwanted inflow on the consumer who received no benefits, instead of the marketer. This is consistant with how many businesses try to transfer costs to society while retaining earnings for themselves. I have come to believe that the only equitable way to solve the problem is to have electronic postage, with the sender paying for each message sent and the receiver getting some of that postage as a credit to his or her own postage account. The accounts could be maintained by the USPS for a small percentage off the top.


    Cynthia Otis Charlton

    I don't like it in my mail
    I don't like it on my fax
    I don't like junk mail PERIOD unless I ask for it.
    I hope (and encourage) the legislation to go through. (And you thought this was going to be poetic...)


    Douglas Itkin

    Why not get advertisements? We see it in newspapers and hear it on the radio (except NPR unless those long sponsor credits are considered advertising), so why not on the internet. It's very simple for someone to filter your email into folders and then just trash what you don't want. For example in Eudora go to Filters and transfer all incoming email that doesn't contain your actual address into a junk mail folder, since most of the real junk mail is sent to generic addresses.

    Obviously someone is replying to the get rich quick by sending junk email pyramid schemes, so they keeping coming. If someone could arrest the pyramid scheme senders and just leave the legitimate pr announcements alone it would be fine with me.


    Frederick Rich

    Yes: Like junk mail from the post office, I might not want 99 of 100 junk mail items but I might want that 100th item but I did not know I wanted it until it arrived. Of course, I never get 100 paper junk mail items in one day but I might get 100 e-mail junk mail items becuase of the low cost for the sender. Thus I do see a need to keep the volume to a tolerable level.


    Robert L. Berry

    Why should e-mail be any different from snail mail? There should, however, be a place where people can sign up to block certain types of e-mail that could be used by bulk mail senders. This would be the equivalent being able to go to the post office and define what you consider to be "obscene" and not have it delivered to you.

    Why is it that everyone is all up in arms about the Internet and e-mail being so different when most of the things done there have been done in other ways for years, if not millennia? I'd be willing to bet that when telephones first found widespread use, somebody got excited because someone use that telephone to make an illicit date with similar to the recent case on the Internet.


    Joseph Coen

    I don't see how we can totally prohibit even spam in a free society. I do think that we should be able to regulate it, much as mail is regulated. after all there is such thing as mail fraud. why not e-mail fraud.


    Thanks to all of you who took the time to write in!