Friday, May 9th, 2008
Eat Local? Or Eat Differently?
When it comes to greenhouse gas emissions, what you eat may be more important than where that food comes from, a new study finds. Writing in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, researchers report that replacing the calories from red meat and dairy products in one day's worth of your diet with calories from chicken, fish, or vegetables could have the same impact on greenhouse gas emissions as shifting to an entirely locally-grown diet.
"Eating local' has become an important concept among the environmentally conscious in recent years. The impact on greenhouse gas emissions of becoming a locavore, however, may not be as big as proponents would like. "Our analysis shows that despite all the attention given to food miles, the distance that food travels is only around 11% of the average American household’s food-related greenhouse gas emissions," said Chris Weber, one of the authors of the report. In this segment, Ira talks with Weber about the study's results and about the impact of dietary choices on greenhouse gases.
Guests
Christopher Weber
Assistant Research Professor, Civil and Environmental
Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Related Links
Segment produced by:Annette Heist
Listen:
Friday, May 9th, 2008
-
Digital TV Transition
- Eat Local? Or Eat Differently?
-
Weedkiller Worries
-
The Missing Memristor?
-
The Dry Sahara
-
An AIDS Anniversary
Elsewhere on Sciencefriday.com
Bird of a Different Feather
Battling Blight
Are All Calories Created Equal?
Fish and Mercury
Psychology of Food and Eating
Food and The President
Tuna
Tomatoes and Salmonella
New Government Report Tackles Global Warming Effects
Beer: The Foam is Sexy















