Friday, January 16th, 2009
Fish and Mercury
Eating fish is good for you -- unless the fish contains the heavy metal mercury. That's why government health groups have urged certain at-risk people, especially children and expectant mothers, to limit consumption of certain seafood. In late 2008, however, the FDA began circulating a draft report that said potential health benefits of eating fish outweigh the potential ill effects of mercury.
The EPA disagrees. The environmental agency issued a countering memo calling the FDA study "scientifically flawed and inadequate." In this segment, we'll sort the science from the hype in this ongoing debate over the risks and benefits of eating fish.
Guests
Joshua Cohen
Research Associate Professor of Medicine
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts
Jane M. Hightower
Internal Medicine Physician
Author, "Diagnosis: Mercury; Money, Politics and Poison"
San Francisco, California
Related Links
- Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish
- What You Need to Know about Mercury in Fish and Shellfish
- NOW: Mercury in Fish
- Mercury in Fish: Two Views
Segment produced by:Annette Heist
Listen:
Friday, January 16th, 2009
Elsewhere on Sciencefriday.com
BPA and the FDA
Fisheries Improving?
Future of the FDA
Tagging Tuna
Tuna
Mass Extinction Event On the Horizon?
The Search for Lake Trout
Eat Local? Or Eat Differently?
Weedkiller Worries
Lousey Death














