Listen
Archive
2013
January
February
March
April
May
June
2012
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2011
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2010
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2009
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2008
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2007
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Subscribe
May. 08, 2009
The Hobbit Debate
|
|
|
Tweet |
| When the bones of an unusually small hominin were discovered in a cave on the Indonesian island of Flores in 2003, the find sparked a battle in anthropological circles: were the bones the remnants of a new species of hominin, previously unknown to science, yet alive as recently as 12000 years ago -- or were the bones in the cave from modern humans suffering from microcephaly and other bone deformations? The argument over the bones, which have come to be nicknamed 'hobbits' due to their small size and large feet, has continued in the scientific literature ever since. This week in the journal Nature, a team of researchers make the case that Homo floresiensis was indeed a distinct species, and that the hobbits may be even more distantly related to modern humans than previously thought. We'll talk about the hobbit studies and what they tell us about human evolution. |
Produced by Flora Lichtman, Correspondent and Managing Editor, Video
Guests
-
William L. Jungers
Distinguished Teaching Professor and Chairman
Department of Anatomical Sciences
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, NY -
Daniel E. Lieberman
Professor,
Department of Anthropology
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA



Discussion