Subscribe to Science Friday
Geologist Steve Squyres risked his career and millions of dollars to get two rovers roaming on Mars. But the mission almost didn’t make it to the launch pad. Steve and NASA engineer Jennifer Trosper describe the many obstacles the team faced in getting Spirit and Opportunity ready, from ripped parachutes to fuzzy camera feeds, and the problem-solving it took to safely land the twin vehicles on Martian soil.
“The Leap” is a 10-episode audio series that profiles scientists willing to take big risks to push the boundaries of discovery. It premieres on Science Friday’s podcast feed every Monday until July 21.
“The Leap” is a production of the Hypothesis Fund, brought to you in partnership with Science Friday.
Segment Guests
Steve Squyres is best known for his key role as Principal Investigator for the science payload on the Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity.
Segment Transcript
JASON WILLIS: Flight director Jason Willis reporting. We are currently six minutes away from hitting the top of the Martian atmosphere. We are expecting that the weather today at the landing site–
FLORA LICHTMAN: 20 years ago, a group of scientists and engineers assembled in NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory to watch history being made. Spirit, the first rover designed to roam Mars, was dropping down on the red planet after a 300 million mile journey. Its twin rover opportunity was scheduled to land a few weeks later.
JASON WILLIS: At this time, we are roughly 11 minutes, 48 seconds from landing at the Gusev crater in the Southern hemisphere of Mars.
FLORA LICHTMAN: For the last three years, this team had worked to anticipate and mitigate every single problem that might crop up. But in this moment, they were just spectators.
STEVE SQUYRES: We in our control room, we had no control at all.
FLORA LICHTMAN: This is Steve Squyres, the principal investigator of the Mars exploration Rover mission. Because Mars is so far away, it takes a long time for a signal to get back to Earth.
STEVE SQUYRES: When the speed of light gets involved, even simple words like now don’t really quite have the same meaning.
FLORA LICHTMAN: So everything that they’re seeing in this moment had already happened.
STEVE SQUYRES: So I’m sitting in the control room looking at the Doppler signal from the spacecraft, starting to feel the Martian atmosphere.
JASON WILLIS: The vehicle is now at the top of the Martian atmosphere.
STEVE SQUYRES: The reality is it’s been on the surface of Mars for four minutes, either bouncing happily or a smoking hole in the ground. We don’t know.
JASON WILLIS: Stil awaiting signal that we are on the ground.
FLORA LICHTMAN: It wasn’t just that Steve didn’t have control. There was a lot on the line.
STEVE SQUYRES: $1 billion dollars, my career, careers of many, many other people, very high stakes game we were playing.
FLORA LICHTMAN: And high risk. The mission was so audacious that people thought it was completely impossible. Most of the world didn’t think we could do it. We believed we could.
JASON WILLIS: We got signs of bouncing on the surface.
FLORA LICHTMAN: You can see Steve dropping to his knees in the control room.
STEVE SQUYRES: We’re jumping up and down and cheering like we just won the Super Bowl. We’re going crazy.
JASON WILLIS: This is a very good sign.
FLORA LICHTMAN: This turned out to be a phenomenally, almost unbelievably, successful mission. The rovers made it to Mars and outlived their predicted lifespans by many, many years. They made big science discoveries and blazed a path for future Mars exploration, like the Curiosity Rover and Perseverance. So given all that success, you might not guess that just getting to the Cape Canaveral launch pad might have been the biggest achievement of all. This mission almost crashed and burned a number of times before it even got off the ground.
STEVE SQUYRES: All these years later, people will look at it and say, oh, 14 years are on Mars, it was a miracle that you got it to work for that long. And I always wanted to say it was a miracle we got to Florida. This is The Leap, a new series about scientists who are risking their careers, their reputations, and even their lives to make a breakthrough.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
STEVE SQUYRES: When I was very, very young, eight years old, I was fascinated by exploration, read books about the history of exploration all the time. And I would have told you I was a scientist. I just wasn’t a good one yet.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Like most eight-year-olds, but he kept at it. He studied geology in college, and for one of his classes, he did a project on the Mars Viking orbiter, which was sending back these enticing new pictures of Mars. And Steve started fantasizing about all the questions he could answer if he could get down and dirty with the Martian soil, if he could just roam around Mars. His wheels began to turn.
STEVE SQUYRES: The dream of sending rovers to Mars and doing really the first overland expedition across another planet slowly came into focus over a period of many years.
FLORA LICHTMAN: By the late 80s, as a young professor at Cornell, he started to pitch the project. And over the next 10 years, he wrote proposal after proposal after proposal to NASA, each one rejected.
STEVE SQUYRES: So that’s the way it should be. It really is. I mean, you’re asking the government to provide hundreds of millions of dollars to do your science experiment and you better have a pretty good story.
FLORA LICHTMAN: The story Steve was telling NASA is that they needed to get a better look at the Martian surface, a zoomed in view, the view you could only get from driving on Mars.
STEVE SQUYRES: You got to realize at this point in time, the only look that we had ever gotten down on the surface of Mars was the two Viking landing sites and then later the Mars Pathfinder site. And all three of those was a flat plane of identical looking boulders extending off into the distance in all directions. Mars looked boring in those pictures, but I knew from seeing it from orbit that all of Mars isn’t like that.
FLORA LICHTMAN: During those 10 years, what kept you writing proposals? Some people might quit after the first one gets rejected or the second one or the third one gets rejected.
STEVE SQUYRES: There were a couple of reasons I kept going. One was that I really knew if we had a chance to do it and we succeeded at doing it, two different things, it was going to be great. And another thing was simply all the effort that I’d put in. I didn’t want 10 years of work to be wasted, right. Now–
FLORA LICHTMAN: Sunk cost is what I’m hearing.
STEVE SQUYRES: Yeah, people will tell you should not make big decisions on the basis of sunk costs, but that’s, kind of, what I was doing.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Steve sent in a fourth proposal, and he told himself, OK, if this one’s not selected, I will stop. He got to the final round. NASA was choosing between his project and an orbiter mission.
STEVE SQUYRES: And we knew they were going to pick one of the two. And there was a meeting at NASA headquarters with the NASA administrator to decide what was going to fly. And I remember I was sitting in my office at Cornell University. I knew the meeting was happening. I was waiting for the phone to ring.
The phone rang, and it was like everybody from the Mars program at NASA headquarters all gathered around a speakerphone. And they said, Steve, we have to ask you something. Can you build two? And as God is my witness, I said two what? And they said two rovers.
And I was just floored. I mean, not one of us on the project had dared to suggest to NASA that we ought to send two. It took the NASA administrator to see that that was the smart thing to do.
FLORA LICHTMAN: So if one fails, you have the other one.
STEVE SQUYRES: Yeah, and that was it. And we were off and running.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Were you like, I’ve just won the lottery.
STEVE SQUYRES: No, it didn’t feel like we’d won the lottery because it was real obvious that it was going to be a terrible, terrible challenge to get those things built and done and ready to launch. It was 34 months before we had to have the spacecraft on top of the rockets in Florida.
FLORA LICHTMAN: How many months?
STEVE SQUYRES: 34. And you typically need at least four years to do something like this, and it’s better if you got five. We had a shade less than three. It was sporting.
JENNIFER TROSPER: It was a sprint for three years. It was absolutely a sprint.
FLORA LICHTMAN: This is Jennifer Trosper, a Jet Propulsion Lab engineer who has rocked many a Mars mission.
JENNIFER TROSPER: I’ve been on every Mars Rover that’s ever touched wheels on Mars, and I always say I have four children of my own. And then I have Sojourner, Spirit, Opportunity, Curiosity, and Perseverance.
FLORA LICHTMAN: And even though she loves all her children equally, Spirit and Opportunity was a special mission. In 2000 when this got greenlit, there was a lot on the line for NASA.
JENNIFER TROSPER: So the Mars program was hanging by a thread, frankly.
STEVE SQUYRES: What had happened was the two missions that were launched to Mars in 1998 both failed. One crashed on the surface. The other one famously burned up in the Martian atmosphere because of a mix up over English and metric units.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Oh, that’s embarrassing.
STEVE SQUYRES: That’s a very bad way to lose a spacecraft. Don’t let it happen to you.
JENNIFER TROSPER: And this mission was the savior mission. We just had to succeed.
FLORA LICHTMAN: And Jennifer had a big role to play. Jennifer was the lead systems engineer. So there’s scores of people working on these rovers, people in charge of building the robotic arm. Other people are in charge of the software for that arm and the cameras and the wheels and so on and so on. Jennifer’s job was making sure all the pieces fit together.
JENNIFER TROSPER: And the interesting thing was I don’t think I was really prepared for it. I mean, I’m certain. I’m certain.
FLORA LICHTMAN: When Jennifer started the role, one of her first tasks was presenting at the NASA preliminary design review. Passing is required to go forward with the mission. Jennifer’s job as lead systems engineer was to summarize and present on all the risks to the mission and how they were planning on mitigating them. But Jennifer had just started, and she did not have that risk list in hand.
JENNIFER TROSPER: I’d been on the job like three weeks or something. And we walk into this preliminary design review. And I’m sitting in the back of the room writing the risk list based on listening to people give their presentations.
FLORA LICHTMAN: It did not go well.
JENNIFER TROSPER: We failed. We absolutely failed that review.
FLORA LICHTMAN: They had to get the next one right.
JENNIFER TROSPER: So we hunkered down for four months and managed to get past the preliminary design review. And then it was just so much to do.
FLORA LICHTMAN: They were facing a to do list 300 million miles long, a list that required deep collaboration between two camps that don’t always see the world the same way, the scientists like Steve and the engineers like Jennifer.
STEVE SQUYRES: A lot of people don’t adequately appreciate how different those disciplines are. Scientists are seekers of truth. We want to how the universe works, and there are no limits on what we want to know. And so we would like there to be no limits on what we can know, all right.
Engineers are practical. They’re inventors. They’re tinkerers. They’re builders. They have to build machines, and machines have to work.
And so there’s this built in creative tension between science and engineering on a project like this, where the scientists want everything. The engineers need it to work. And that tension, when the culture is right, can lead to creative partnerships and getting stuff done that nobody believed could be done. And I’ve also seen projects where it’s this acid that eats away at the whole thing.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Team corroding acid, that was the thing Steve could not afford on this project. So he along with Jennifer’s boss, Pete Theisinger, who passed away in 2024, worked very hard to bridge this cultural gap.
STEVE SQUYRES: And I hammered into my team’s heads the notion that we had to learn some engineering. We had to understand this vehicle, what it could do, what it couldn’t do. We had to ask for what was reasonable and not ask for what was unreasonable.
FLORA LICHTMAN: This isn’t always how it works on a project like this.
JENNIFER TROSPER: It is often hard to understand the other side.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Engineering challenges come up that cause slowdowns. So you can imagine that on some projects, scientists might get frustrated, and they might start asking annoying questions like–
JENNIFER TROSPER: Why are we taking so long to figure it out. If you failed to accomplish the objective for the day, well, what’s wrong with you guys, why did you make that error.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Steve didn’t do that, Jennifer says.
JENNIFER TROSPER: He took ownership of all that. If it took longer, he felt like he was part of why it took longer.
FLORA LICHTMAN: And Steve tried to make sure his scientists went about things the same way. To build understanding, he had his scientists get familiar with the rovers while they were being built and tested.
STEVE SQUYRES: Put on the White coat, go into the clean room, start taking some data, get used to the– hands on, get used to that instrument because it’s the same piece of hardware you’re going to be using on Mars in a year, so that when we got to the surface of Mars, we knew how hard to push. And we knew when it was time to back off. You got to get the science, but you got to keep the thing alive, too.
FLORA LICHTMAN: While Steve was trying to mitigate these future problems on Mars, the team was also facing a Kuiper belt’s worth of problems here on Earth.
STEVE SQUYRES: There were so many times when I thought, this is it. It’s over. I think maybe one of the very lowest moments was when we did the first tests of the parachute design that we thought was going to land on Mars.
FLORA LICHTMAN: This is a test where they take a stand in for the lander. In this case, they used a 3,000 pound weight shaped like a dart, and they drop it from thousands of feet in the air to test out the landing parachutes.
STEVE SQUYRES: It was done at a National Guard range outside of Boise, Idaho, which is a place where you can drop big, heavy things from the sky, and they won’t kill anybody. And yeah, we had this big Chinook helicopter and took this big test article up. Dropped it. It fell.
The parachute deployed. It made this beautiful orange and white bowl, and then it just exploded. It just ripped to pieces and parachute after parachute failed. And we were really in trouble. The vehicle had gotten so heavy that the parachutes couldn’t land it. And if the parachutes don’t work, you’re done.
FLORA LICHTMAN: What were you thinking?
STEVE SQUYRES: Oh, shit. What else can you say?
FLORA LICHTMAN: And this wasn’t the only hiccup. They had an issue with the pyrotechnics weeks before they were set to launch, issues with the cameras.
STEVE SQUYRES: Where we were getting this horrible speckled data just looked like static on a TV set. I mean, it was– you couldn’t even figure out the images. We finally were pretty sure that we had traced it to a way that some wires had been built, and I was 98% convinced that that was the answer. We had found it and fixed it, but I wasn’t really sure until we got to Mars.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Whoa, really?
STEVE SQUYRES: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
FLORA LICHTMAN: At one point, Jennifer was asked to work on a risk assessment for the whole mission to determine the probability of whether they’d make the deadline. The numbers came back around 30% likely to succeed.
JENNIFER TROSPER: And so all the official analysis, kind of, pointed towards it’s a real crapshoot.
FLORA LICHTMAN: In some ways, this is the nature of a big, ambitious project that’s trying to achieve something unprecedented. But there are different ways to deal with risks. You could take a top down approach, designate leadership as the decision-makers, require a bunch of paperwork, or you can empower people on the ground, the people closest to the problem to make the decisions as they face them. Jennifer says that’s what they tried to do on this project.
JENNIFER TROSPER: Definitely in the documentation world, we lightweighted it. And people might say, oh, that risk process wasn’t perfect because somebody standing in a chamber somewhere making the decision. It’s not like everybody’s sitting in a room, but there is a dynamic there that builds great teams when you empower people.
STEVE SQUYRES: So yeah, there was a lot at stake. But boy, you talk about something that makes you feel alive. This is hard to beat.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Is that true? Did you feel like extra alive at that time?
STEVE SQUYRES: Oh, gosh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah, it’s like your senses are heightened. You don’t need as much sleep. Mentally, it was just, like, we all shifted into a higher gear that we didn’t know we had.
And it’s not sustainable. You can’t be that intense all the time. I had no way I’d be able to live my whole life like that. But for a few years, yeah. We did it.
SPEAKER 1: 4, 3, 2, 1, engine start and liftoff of the Delta II rocket carrying the Spirit from Earth to planet Mars.
FLORA LICHTMAN: What was launch like for you?
STEVE SQUYRES: Wow Launch was completely different from what I expected, completely different. So when I first started down this road, 13 years before we launched them, one of the things that sustained me through all those hard times was imagining launch and imagining launch as this triumphant moment when all the problems were cleared. We were ready to go, light those rockets off, and they go soaring off into space, carrying our hopes and dreams with them.
SPEAKER 2: Responding. Vehicles, recovering very nicely from the liftoff transients.
STEVE SQUYRES: And it’s just this moment of triumph standing there on the beach in Florida. It was not like that at all. For two reasons, one was that I didn’t feel ready to let him go.
So we had two lists of tests. We had one shortish list that we called the incompressible test list. These were the tests that we had to do and had to pass, or NASA wouldn’t let us fly. And we wouldn’t let us fly. We got everything on the incompressible list done, but then we had a whole bunch of other tests that we wanted to do, but it’s time to go, and you have to launch them. And so you launch them not feeling as confident as you want to that they’re ready to do the job that we’re going to ask them to do at Mars.
The other thing that was weird about launch, though, was that it was hard to say goodbye. So many long nights, so many long nights in the test labs right there next to the rovers, lying on the floor underneath the belly of one of the rovers, trying to give directions on the headset to the guy who’s trying to put the cameras where we’re trying. No, no, go left, not right.
And the way that we projected our feelings, our hopes, our aspirations, our dreams, our frustrations, all of those things into these machines that we had built, the machines became extensions of ourselves. And you just get so attached to these things. And boy, you put them on top of a rocket and you fire them off into space, and they are gone. Yeah, it really was hard to say goodbye, and I didn’t expect that at all.
FLORA LICHTMAN: Spirit launched in early June of 2003, and opportunity went about a month later. And they had these long, fruitful lives on Mars. They were only supposed to last a few months on the planet. Spirit went for six years and opportunity for over 14. The rovers found evidence of liquid water on the surface of Mars, a huge discovery. But when I asked Steve about the highlight for him, his answer surprised me.
STEVE SQUYRES: To me now, the whole thing is over, 14 years on Mars, big success, all of that. For me, personally, the part, if you could say, Steve you can have 18 months to live over again, just to experience it one more time, I would pick the last 18 months before we launched, We had such an extraordinary team of people, and there was this sense of shared struggle that bound the team together. I’ve never experienced anything like it before or since.
I get choked up even today thinking about it. Those people meant so much to me.
JENNIFER TROSPER: The people are the real story here. You’re inspired by the people around you. You’re inspired by what they figure out, by the problems they solve. To be a part of a team and know that you couldn’t even get close to accomplishing anything like this on your own, and that’s how we move it forward.
STEVE SQUYRES: It was just all the ingredients for a high intensity, high pressure do or die. You’re going to make it, or you’re going to fail spectacularly. All those ingredients were there, and we just had to do it. So we did.
SPEAKER 3: We have six wheels in the dirt.
SPEAKER 4: Well, now we are the mission that we all envisioned 3 and 1/2 years ago.
Speaker 5, both rows are performing marvelously.
STEVE SQUYRES: I was hoping we’d find something truly new and different. Well, we have.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
FLORA LICHTMAN: The Leap is a production of the Hypothesis Fund. The show is hosted by me, Flora Lichtman, and produced by Annette Heist, editing by Christopher Intagliata, and David Sanford. Fact checking by Nicole Pasulka, mixing and scoring by Emma Munger, music by Joshua Budo Karp. Thanks to Jim Bell, Rob Manning, and Wayne Li. And thanks to you for listening.
Copyright © 2025 Science Friday Initiative. All rights reserved. Science Friday transcripts are produced on a tight deadline by 3Play Media. Fidelity to the original aired/published audio or video file might vary, and text might be updated or amended in the future. For the authoritative record of Science Friday’s programming, please visit the original aired/published recording. For terms of use and more information, visit our policies pages at http://www.sciencefriday.com/about/policies/
Meet the Producer
About Flora Lichtman
Flora Lichtman is a host of Science Friday. In a previous life, she lived on a research ship where apertivi were served on the top deck, hoisted there via pulley by the ship’s chef.