Turning Down the Greenhouse Gases in Your Air Conditioning
More than 150 countries approved an agreement to phase out the production and use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Used in air conditioning and refrigeration units, HFCs are heat-trapping chemicals that contribute to increasing global temperatures. John Upton, a senior science writer for Climate Central, breaks down the good and bad of the agreement.
John Upton is a Senior Science Writer for Climate Central, in New York, New York.
IRA FLATOW: And now it’s time to play good thing, bad thing, because every story has a flip side. Last December, 195 countries signed the Paris Climate Agreement. Each country pledged to curb emissions to keep global temperatures increase well and keep it under 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. And countries will meet every five years to set even higher targets. Pretty ambitious goal.
Well, this week over 100 countries signed a smaller, but no less ambitious climate change agreement. The target? Phasing out hydrofluorocarbons or HRCs. These are the chemicals in your air conditioner and your refrigerators. My next guest is here to break down that agreement. John Upton is a senior science writer for Climate Central based out of New York. He and I are here in our [INAUDIBLE] studios. Welcome to Science Friday.
JOHN UPTON: Thanks very much. It’s great to be with you.
IRA FLATOW: What is the problem raised by these HFCs here?
JOHN UPTON: To understand that, it helps to really think back to the 1980s when we discovered that the ozone layer was in a lot of trouble. And the reason the ozone layer was in trouble was because of these chemicals called CFCs. So the world got together very quickly and basically reached an agreement in Montreal in the Montreal Protocol to eliminate the use of these CFCs. And that’s been a very successful agreement.
Since then, industry and companies have protected the ozone layer by removing the chlorine from these chemicals and producing what’s called HFCs. So what happened on the weekend is in recognition of the fact that these HFCs are very powerful greenhouse gases, countries got together and they agree to amend the Montreal Protocol to also include HFCs.
IRA FLATOW: And these are very powerful greenhouse gases, the HFCs?
JOHN UPTON: These are some of the most powerful greenhouse gases that you can find. Some HFCs are fine, but others are more than 100 times as powerful as carbon dioxide, in some cases, well over 1,000 times.
IRA FLATOW: Wow. And so the good news is that they got together to make this agreement, which will have a big impact.
JOHN UPTON: It could potentially. I mean the thought is that this would prevent a full degree Fahrenheit of warming by the end of the century. So this is a very important agreement, and it could actually have some very real and meaningful impacts.
IRA FLATOW: All right. So much for the good news. What’s the bad side, the bad thing about this?
JOHN UPTON: Well, there are some criticisms of the agreement, because countries like India, which has a fairly large manufacturing base, they’ve received a very long lead time. They really don’t have to start reducing their use of these chemicals until 2028. And the same goes for Pakistan and some of the other countries that they export to.
The reason that’s not as serious as it might sound is because as developed countries, including the US and in the European Union, as they institute their own domestic rules, which they’re already doing to eliminate these chemicals, the alternative products will become much more affordable, and then countries like India will be able to start using them without having to invest too heavily in the research and development phase.
The real concern here in the US– after this agreement was reached, a number of media reports indicated a week ago that there would be no need for Senate ratification of this. And as we reported on Monday and as The Hill is reporting today, there’s not much basis for that. This is a fairly substantial modification to an international treaty. And experts on international law point out that every previous amendment to this agreement has required Senate approval. And it’s not just that the Senate has to approve it, but they need a 2/3 ratification vote.
IRA FLATOW: We’re going to get that in this Congress?
JOHN UPTON: That’s a very good question. Let’s see what happens after this election, what the mood is like. The Senate, even the Republicans and so forth, have always been very supportive of efforts to protect the ozone layer, but we know that this is a climate agreement. This is designed to protect against global warming. And there is this ideology among some of these Republicans in the Senate that they just simply oppose any kind of an effort to protect the climate.
IRA FLATOW: So we’re going to have to see what happens January 20.
JOHN UPTON: Exactly. Yeah. Yeah.
IRA FLATOW: John Upton. Thank you very much–
JOHN UPTON: Well, thank you.
IRA FLATOW: –for coming to be with us. John Upton, and a senior science writer for Climate Change.