This story is a part of our collaboration with Flu Near You to track the flu over the 2018-2019 flu season. Want to help out? Sign up at Flu Near You, and text ‘flu’ to 917-242-4070 to get weekly reminders and tips.

---

When Cynthia Goldsmith hears the word “flu,” the image that immediately comes to mind isn’t one of sniffling noses or feverish foreheads. She thinks of a football-shaped pincushion, with a thick envelope spiked with tiny, thin rods. She sees the shape of the virus.       

“I don’t think of the disease itself, I think of how it looks,” Goldsmith says. “Once I visualize it, then I feel sorry for the person that has the flu.”  

It’s the same for any virus that Goldsmith images under her electron microscope lens at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia—capturing visuals of some of the tiniest, deadliest agents in the world. 

Since she began working at the CDC in October 1983 as an electron microscopist, Goldsmith has encountered many infectious viruses. She has examined fatal strains of the Ebola virus during the 1995 outbreak, was the first to identify that coronavirus is the virus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003, oversaw the first scanning electron microscopic image of HIV in 1984, and captured as many as 35 individual of orthomyxovirus samples, which causes the flu. You probably have seen Goldsmith’s work. Her images of viruses have been showcased on the front cover of magazines, textbooks, news websites, and even on Science Friday on multiple occasions.

“I have been fortunate to look at many deadly viruses by [electron microscopy],” says Goldsmith, who, over the course of her 35-year career at the CDC, “just learned the viruses one by one.”

At the Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch at the CDC, she collaborates with pathologists, molecular biologists, and researchers. Using tools such as a lab-grade microwave, an oven to help embed specimens in resin, and a 120 kilovolt transmission electron microscope, she can create various views of viruses in black and white.

Providing these images helps researchers visualize the specimens that they work with every day, but remain unseen with the naked eye.  

“We can’t obviously see them,” says Terrence Tumpey, a microbiologist and chief of the Immunology and Pathogenesis Branch at the CDC’s Influenza Division, who has worked with Goldsmith. “You need specialized equipment that Cynthia is trained to use and is really good at using. We don’t have that type of equipment. We just have to rely on other assays to be able to know we have a virus.”

But, Tumpey concedes that there’s a personal interest in seeing the images as well.

“It’s always great to visually see these viruses,” he says. “I think everybody enjoys seeing something, especially for the first time.”

In the summer of 2005, Tumpey and a team of researchers got that opportunity to see one of the pathogens for the first time—the virus that caused the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic. The virulent strain of influenza reached the small Alaskan town of Brevig Mission, killing 72 of the 80 residents. In 1997, pathologist Johan Hultin received permission to obtain a piece of a victim’s lung tissue that had been preserved for decades under permafrost in order to try to isolate the 1918 flu virus. Years later, Tumpey, collaborating virologist Jeffrey Taubenberger, and a team of researchers were allowed to study the tissue sample to better understand the genes and proteins that contributed to its high virulence.

The team reconstructed the 1918 virus—slowly and carefully sequencing the whole genome bit by bit—leading other research groups to develop better antivirals.

When they completed the genome, Goldsmith came in to the look at the isolate and took images with the transmission electron microscope. While the flu virus can come in different shapes and sizes, the 1918 flu virus’ shape was similar to the most common appearance of orthomyxovirus: “spherical- to oval-shaped particles with prominent spikes projecting from the surface of the particles,” Goldsmith describes.

“I don’t think of the disease itself, I think of how it looks.”

“I haven’t seen any other images of people doing [electron microscopy] on that virus,” Tumpey says. The series of images Goldsmith produced for the study might not only be the first, but the only electron microscope visuals of the 1918 flu, he says.

The series of images that Goldsmith snapped of the 1918 flu virus, all in the public domain, has since been widely featured in media, textbooks, and other publications—”just about every newspaper that I saw, it was on the front cover in October of 2005,” Tumpey says.

“It is something else just to see how these viruses act inside the cell,” Tumpey says. “Some of them you can see that they’re just starting to form, whereas others it’s more obvious that they’re mature and they’re budding from the surface of the cell.”

 

Related Segment

Tracking The Flu, In Sickness And In Health

Different sample preparation techniques can provide different information about the nature of the virus, Goldsmith explains. For instance, a negative stain is a speedy method that helps Goldsmith quickly prepare individual growing viruses from a batch of lab-cultivated cells for imaging. A thin section, on the other hand, not only gives cross-section views inside particles, but also gives hints about where the virus is growing in the cell—and the location of a virus informs her a lot about the nature and type of virus.

Enteroviruses, a group of viruses known to cause polio and hand, foot, and mouth disease, commonly accumulate in the cytoplasm, Goldsmith explains, while coronaviruses, which infect the nose, sinuses, and upper throat, invade the Golgi complex. “Influenza viruses bud at the surface and so do retroviruses. Most DNA viruses reproduce in the nucleus,” she says.

By finding viruses in different areas of a cell, she can better identify them. Goldsmith’s images from the electron microscope can diagnose viruses down to the family, she says—helping researchers identify herpesvirus, poxvirus, orthomyxovirus, and so on.

“Pathologists will give me a sample, something where they got an unexpected finding, and I can give them a confirmation that that’s what it is,” she says. “The submitter might send in a virus and request a test for a certain pathogen, but it turns out to be a different pathogen once the pathologists look at it and perform all the different tests.”

Identifying the correct pathogen for a disease can be critical, especially during outbreaks. In 2003, China was struck by an epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a serious form of pneumonia that can cause difficulty in breathing and sometimes death. The respiratory virus spread to more than two dozen countries around the world. Laboratories around the world were studying the virus and looking at it with negative staining. But the negative stain made the viruses look like undistinguished spheres that lacked details around its surface, Goldsmith explains.

When Goldsmith received cell cultures cultivated by scientists at the CDC, she decided to look at it with thin section instead.

“When I looked at it, it was just obviously a coronavirus by the way it grew in the cell,” she said. With the thin section, she was able to see that the virus budded to the Golgi complex, which led her to deduce that it was a novel coronavirus.

Once Goldsmith had identified the virus as a coronavirus, other tests were done at CDC—immunohistochemistry, PCR testing—that validated her observation. Within three days, the center had examined a separate isolate from a different patient that helped to confirm that it was the virus causing the outbreak, she says.

“It was the initial thing, that it was a coronavirus, that was helpful to the scientists so that they could pinpoint which test to use,” Goldsmith says.

Although it’s a technical process, the images are striking—and, Goldsmith would argue, artistic.

“My hands are not artistic at all,” she says. “But it is an art.”

Goldsmith might later digitally color the images to help bring out the virus from the cell debris. But she finds the original black and white images—taken straight from the scope—are more captivating.

“They can be beautiful, even though the disease can be devastating,” Goldsmith says. “But they can be beautiful.”

*Editor’s Note 3/27/2019: A previous version of this story misstated that the spikes of the SARS coronavirus could be seen in the thin section image. It has been corrected and we regret the error. 

---