Subscribe to Science Friday
Big cats used to roam the entire United States. You might know them as mountain lions, pumas, cougars, or catamounts. Though they go by many names, they’re actually all the same species.
Their current population is mostly confined to the West, and part of Florida, though in recent years they’ve been spotted in other areas east of the Mississippi River. Most cougars were gone from the Northeast by the 1800s, with the last verified accounts in the 1930s.
Mountain lion ecologist Mark Elbroch hopes to reintroduce these big cats back into their previous habitats in New England. But, should we? What are the benefits and drawbacks of reintroducing the apex predator into an ecosystem it’s been away from for so long?
Donate To Science Friday
Invest in quality science journalism by making a donation to Science Friday.
Segment Guests
Dr. Mark Elbroch is the director of the puma program at Panthera, a big cat conservation organization.
Segment Transcript
[THEME MUSIC] JANE LINDHOLM: Hi, I’m Jane Lindholm, and you’re listening to Science Friday. I’m filling in today for Flora and Ira.
Big cats used to roam across the entire United States. You might know them as mountain lions, pumas, cougars, or catamounts. They have many different names, but they’re actually all the same species. Their current US population is mostly confined to Western states and a small population in Florida, though, in recent years, they’ve been spotted east of the Mississippi River.
Most mountain lions were gone from the Northeast by the 1800s, with the last verified accounts in the 1930s. My next guest is a mountain lion conservationist, hoping to reintroduce these wild cats back to their previous habitats in New England. But should we?
Dr. Mark Elbroch is the director of the Puma Program at Panthera, a big cat conservation and advocacy organization. Mark, thank you so much for joining me.
MARK ELBROCH: Yeah, my pleasure. Thanks for having me on the show.
JANE LINDHOLM: Let’s just jump right in. Why would people want to bring mountain lions back to the Northeast?
MARK ELBROCH: Ooh, that’s a great question. I think one is that sort of reintroducing species that were previously part of ecosystems in the east is, quite honestly, a core American value. It’s been part of American culture, at least our conservation culture, for more than 100 years.
We have reintroduced hundreds of species. People don’t even realize it. Like the black bears, white-tailed deer, river otters, beavers– all of these things were rare at one point in New England or absent in parts of New England and were successfully brought back through reintroduction efforts and protections.
And so I think it’s fair to say that it is a core value of American people to say we did something wrong and we want to right that wrong and bring back and rebuild the ecosystems, which we changed.
JANE LINDHOLM: Beyond wanting to maybe repair something that humans could say we were the ones who damaged, is our ecosystem missing anything without mountain lions?
MARK ELBROCH: Yeah. So large carnivores contribute all sorts of things to ecosystems. And one is that they bolster the ecological health and resilience of an ecosystem, meaning that they are better armed with the internal mechanisms needed to protect themselves after a fire, a wildlife disease outbreak, a timber harvest.
And the ecosystems can recover from those events more quickly when they have systems that are more complex. And large carnivores add to that complexity.
And then the other is that they make animals afraid. And as strange as that sounds, it’s a really important thing. And so for instance, their primary prey, which in New England would be deer, would be pooping in different places. They’d be hiding in different places. And it really spreads nutrients across the landscape in different ways than in their absence.
And those fear effects are really important for us as well. We just did a really cool study out where I live in Washington State, very much like New England in Western Washington, at least in terms of a rural landscape. But we looked at the impact that the local mountain lions were having on deer collisions with people and their cars.
And we found that the areas where the mountain lions were close to the highways, and they were scaring deer away from them, they were reducing local deer collisions with cars by 76%. I mean, that’s a huge number. And it translates into millions of dollars of savings for local communities. And that’s the kind of thing that that fear can create on a landscape.
JANE LINDHOLM: I live in Vermont, and there are many Vermonters who say mountain lions, or as we call them, catamounts, never actually left. And people have been spotting them for the last 150 years. Not possible?
MARK ELBROCH: [LAUGHS] I wish it were true. I lived in New England much of my life as well. And in fact, while I was in New England, I think I investigated 53 sightings, going around and to verify whether these were truly mountain lions or not. And one of them ended up being a mountain lion.
But even when they have been verified as mountain lion, those that have predominantly been documented have been from other places. We expect that they were exotic pets that were released into the wild.
Now, all that said, occasionally a wild mountain lion does make it to New England. And I think the most exciting example of that was in 2011, when a mountain lion that we know originated from the Black Hills of South Dakota made it all the way to the East Coast in a remarkable journey that was documented with not just photographic evidence of people who had cameras in their back yards, but also genetic evidence that was gathered by different state wildlife agencies and then later compared with each other and goes, oh, my goodness, it’s the same one that died in Connecticut in 2011.
So it was an amazing story. And it just shows that it is possible. So I like to say that to folks, that it is possible that they really did see a mountain lion in Vermont. It’s just highly–
JANE LINDHOLM: Unlikely. Yes. And no established breeding populations.
MARK ELBROCH: There are no established breeding populations in New England. No. I wish that were true, too.
JANE LINDHOLM: Well, let’s talk about what it would take to bring back breeding populations in New England. Do we have the right ecosystem now, or are there further steps that would need to be taken before mountain lions could successfully survive here?
MARK ELBROCH: Great question and an easy answer. So I’ll just start by saying the mountain lions are generalists, meaning that they inhabit every kind of forest and almost every kind of habitat available in North America. And so is their habitat New England? Absolutely.
And is there food for mountain lions in New England? Well, their most common prey in the West are deer, elk, beavers, porcupines, and raccoons. Other than elk, we have all of those things in New England.
JANE LINDHOLM: What about forest fragmentation? Not a huge deal in Vermont, but in some of the New England and Northeastern states, a lot more highways that could cause problems for moving mountain lions.
MARK ELBROCH: Yeah. So highways are a big issue for mountain lions in the sense that generally mountain lions don’t make home ranges that overlap a highway. So they don’t split one side, spend half their time on one side, half their time on the other.
And so we generally see large highways that have heavy traffic loads. They’re not always a barrier to movement because young mountain lions, which we call dispersers or transients, the ones that are looking for a territory, they will cross these highways even with heavy traffic loads.
And that’s what ensures the genetic health of all mountain lions scattered across an area with highways in it, because they’ll go across the highway and carry with them genetic material into those mountain lions that live on the other side.
And so a landscape like New England, no problem at all. And you need very few crossings to really maintain genetic health. That’s one of the revelations in the last 10 years in terms of mountain lions is that a single animal that crosses a highway into a new population is enough to really bolster the genetic health of that population.
JANE LINDHOLM: Mark, perhaps an even bigger stumbling block is making sure that you have both political and public buy-in for a project like this, especially when we’re talking about an apex predator or an animal where there is some cultural fear around.
In this case, Vermont has started to become the epicenter of this reintroduction idea so far. It was the first state to introduce a bill that would study the reintegration of mountain lions. That bill didn’t move forward, but it did come up in the legislature.
There’s an environmental advocacy group called Mighty Earth that has started pushing this project. I see some of their road signs out in my neighborhoods. And they’ve even said that they’d like to have paws on the ground in four years.
But there is pushback already to the plan, too. Vermont Fish and Wildlife has said it’s too soon to be considering reintroduction. There’s still a lot more research that needs to be done, they say. So how much of a reintroduction plan is actually about political and community education?
MARK ELBROCH: Well, for this species, it’s all about public outreach, education, and political will. And the team that I work with, which we loosely call ourselves the Cougar Research Collaborative, has already done public surveys at the state level.
What’s been very clear is that across the East that we’ve sampled, people are supportive of the reintroduction of mountain lions. People are supportive regardless of their political affiliation or how they identify as a hunter, or whether they call themselves a conservative– all of these things, even across age groups.
So we feel like that part has been quite well addressed. Now, could we broaden the net? Could we reach out to every different group that might be called a special-interest group to check in with them if they would support such an initiative? Yes. And that actually is generally what happens during a feasibility assessment. And that’s what Vermont proposed to do. So that’s one part.
Political will is the other thing you brought up. And in fact, that’s probably, in terms of a reintroduction of this species, the bigger issue. And I think it’s fair to say that at this point, we have yet to identify a champion. And by that I mean a person or a state or a group of individuals that are either legislators, governors, leadership in a state wildlife agency that are genuinely enthused about this idea and are ready to carry it through the inevitable pushbacks that will come up.
And I say inevitable, not because there isn’t public support, but because state wildlife agencies have so much old inertia because they are still running themselves as they were designed to do over 100 years ago. And it’s just not conducive to embracing and reintroducing large carnivores.
But I do think it’s important to emphasize that all of these state agencies are strapped for cash. They all have the list of things they’d like to do. And they all have a budget that doesn’t meet those desires. And so when an outside group comes in and says, hey, we’d love you to do reintroduction of mountain lions, it isn’t even on their radar.
Of course, the response is like, my goodness, we can’t even keep up with our current priorities. And if we were given money, would this be one of our top priorities?
JANE LINDHOLM: Do you think it’s actually going to happen? Are we going to see wild mountain lions in the Northeast in your lifetime?
MARK ELBROCH: I believe it’s possible.
JANE LINDHOLM: That’s not very affirmative.
MARK ELBROCH: [LAUGHS] I am not the decision-maker.
JANE LINDHOLM: Yeah.
MARK ELBROCH: If it were up to me, I’d say absolutely. All we need is that political champion who says, let’s do this. I want part of my legacy to be rebuilding the health of these local ecosystems that we can, as a community of people, embrace that reintroduction as well and be proud of it.
JANE LINDHOLM: Well, Mark, thank you very much for sharing your enthusiasm for these wild cats with us and your expertise. I appreciate it.
MARK ELBROCH: Sure. My pleasure.
JANE LINDHOLM: Dr. Mark Elbroch is the director of the Puma Program at Panthera, a big cat conservation organization.
This episode was produced by Shoshannah Buxbaum. If you enjoyed this conversation or have ideas of what else we should cover on the show, leave us a voicemail at 877-4-SCI-FRI. 877, the number 4, SCI-FRI. Our listener line is always open. I’m Jane Lindholm. Thanks for listening.
[THEME MUSIC]
Copyright © 2026 Science Friday Initiative. All rights reserved. Science Friday transcripts are produced on a tight deadline by 3Play Media. Fidelity to the original aired/published audio or video file might vary, and text might be updated or amended in the future. For the authoritative record of Science Friday’s programming, please visit the original aired/published recording. For terms of use and more information, visit our policies pages at http://www.sciencefriday.com/about/policies/
Meet the Producers and Host
About Jane Lindholm
Jane Lindholm is the host, executive producer and creator of “But Why: A Podcast For Curious Kids.” She also produces special projects for Vermont Public and was previously host and editor of “Vermont Edition.”
About Shoshannah Buxbaum
Shoshannah Buxbaum is a producer for Science Friday. She’s particularly drawn to stories about health, psychology, and the environment. She’s a proud New Jersey native and will happily share her opinions on why the state is deserving of a little more love.